National Broadband Network
How to rein in NBN costs
The already highly politicised National Broadband Network has become an even hotter political potato since it has become apparent that the Government cannot deliver on its promise of 93% coverage for $36 billion. Given that it is politically unacceptable to increase the NBN budget, is there a way that 93% can still get fast broadband without breaking the bank? Perhaps.
ALP die-hards will probably hate me saying this but Shadow Broadband Minister Malcolm Turnbull has already publicly stated the solution.
A good proportion – perhaps 25% or more – of Australians, including yours truly, already have a form of fibre – hybrid fibre coaxial cable (HFC) – running past and to their homes. Hands up those who have Foxtel and/or Bigpond or Optusnet cable broadband.
As a user, I can say the technology that delivers the services is pretty darned good. It may not reach the lofty heights of a future FttH installation, but it’s here right now and it more than serves the needs of its users.
Yes, I know upload speeds are much slower than download speeds and it’s a locally a shared service but it’s still pretty good.
That being the case, it is absolute madness to not even consider incorporating the HFC network into the NBN instead of simply switching it off.
The whole idea of the NBN is supposedly to bridge the digital divide and make fast broadband accessible to nearly all Australians.
Well I already have access to fast broadband capable of delivering all sorts of applications including high-end videoconferencing and movies on demand. I don’t see a single good reason to shut down a perfectly good network that already delivers these high quality services at an affordable price just because it isn’t the chosen technology of a particular government.
And herein lies the crux of the matter. We could still have a “relatively” affordable NBN if we could get past the fanatical quasi-socialist semi-religious conviction of some adherents who believe that we must at all costs ditch everything we already have so that everybody everywhere gets their broadband delivered through exactly the same medium using one technology.
It is perfectly clear that a substantial proportion of the population simply do not need FttH for the foreseeable future so why are we hell bent on breaking the bank to force it on them?
Let’s leave aside the 4G wireless argument for the moment and let’s accept that the copper network is going to be consigned to the scrap heap of history, but let’s bring some sanity back to this debate.
If the Government is really serious about delivering the NBN within its already massive budget to 93% of Australia, then incorporate the already successfully operating HFC network. After all, it is paying Telstra a handsome sum to turn it off.
Source: http://www.itwire.com/opinion-and-analysis/beerfiles/46433-how-to-rein-in-nbn-costs
NBN Co visits Prysmian fibre factory: pics

(Credit: Prysmian)
Prysmian receives raw material, being fine glass fibre, from a supplier. The company first coats the fibre using colour-coded string and then bundles the coated strands in a particular way to make up fibre-optic cables.
Colour coding is especially useful when terminating or splicing fibre. The colours help technicians to ensure they are splicing like-for-like fibres.
Here a Dee Why plant operator inputs string to the optical-fibre colouring line so that the fibre may be colour coated.
Source: http://www.zdnet.com.au/nbn-co-visits-prysmian-fibre-factory-pics-339308703.htm
Govt distances itself from NBN controversy
The Federal Government is trying to distance itself from a controversy attached to the company building the National Broadband Network (NBN).
NBN Co has suspended its tendering process for network construction, telling 14 companies vying for a contract that their proposals are too expensive.
The government business enterprise has blamed inflated charges for its decision to postpone a key stage of the NBN’s second-stage rollout.
With the controversy threatening to become another political liability, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has tried to distance himself from the matter.
“Procurement processes are commercial matters for NBN Co which occur at arm’s length from government,” Conroy said.
“The government supports NBN Co striving to get the best deal from contractors.”
Opposition communications spokesman Malcolm Turnbull has called on Conroy to guarantee the $36 billion project would be completed on schedule and within budget.
“Does the admission that none of the major Australian construction groups in the tender were willing to do the work at NBN Co’s target price indicate that the network’s economics and business case are unrealistic and unachievable?” Turnbull asked.
Talks are reportedly being held with a major Australian construction company.
The Communications Electrical and Plumbing Union, which represents NBN workers, fears its members will lose out from a new tendering process.
“Traditionally, when they want to cut prices, it’s the labour prices they reduce,” the union’s NBN project co-ordinator Allen Hicks told AAP.
“In a commercial market, the project administrators say, ‘Your tender’s too high’.
“They normally revisit labour costs because prices of materials are normally fixed.”
Hicks said NBN Co should reveal what other project agreements it was comparing tenders against.
NBN Co’s head of corporate services Kevin Brown said construction groups were charging too much.
“I wouldn’t describe it as price-gouging but we’re not satisfied we’re getting fair value for money so we’re going to go about this in a different way,” Brown told ABC Radio.
The Australian Constructors Association has criticised NBN Co for changing its procurement strategy so late in the process.
“The NBN Co has suggested that the bids it received did not represent value for money,” the group’s executive director Jim Barrett said.
“This criticism is surprising given that the bids received were the result of a vigorously competitive tender process involving 14 bidders.”
The NBN business model involves supplying 93 per cent of Australian homes with optical-fibre cables by December 2020.
While the government insists fixed-line optical fibres are the way of the future, take-up for wireless internet jumped by 50 per cent in 2010, pushing access numbers to 4.2 million, official figures show.
The news from the Australian Bureau of Statistics comes only weeks after a government-commissioned report said competition from wireless technology could pose a threat to the NBN.
Wireless now comprises 40 per cent of Australia’s internet service market and was the fastest-growing technology last year.
NBN Co is aiming to build a network with speeds of 100 megabits per second, which is five times faster than existing speeds.
But the latest data shows broadband speeds of more than 24 megabits a second made up less than 9 per cent of the market.
Source: http://www.zdnet.com.au/govt-distances-itself-from-nbn-controversy-339312532.htm
Address to the Melbourne Press Club
In his address to the Melbourne Press Club, NBN Co CEO Mike Quigley outlined the status of the NBN project, responded to some misconceptions and confusion about the NBN, and said that the company would be undertaking a public information and education campaign to improve understanding of the project as the rollout progressed.
Global prize for Townsville points way to smarter cities, says NBN
NBN Co Limited, the company building Australia’s National Broadband Network, today welcomed the announcement that Townsville has been selected as one of 24 cities worldwide to be awarded a grant to use technology to make the city smarter and more liveable.






